Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

The size of the size zero debate

September 27th 2007 07:25
The size zero debate is the new black, the latest fashion trend, which, like all fads, is probably not wise to buy (into) too much. I am not saying that the emaciated idealisation of the female body is not a problem, but that the media and public response is on the side of hysteria. For some perspective on my perspective, it should be known that I am not a size zero. I am not six foot tall, and I do not know anyone that has come under the attack of this new moralizing discourse.

thin model
A skinny model, quick! Where's the bandwagon?! Image from dancewithshadows.com


While I agree there are consequences to 'ultra-thin' perfectionism, I also believe there are great gaps in the solutions, and further discrepancies in the debate itself. I admit, restrictions on size in the smaller spectrum of models in Madrid, and soon Australia, are potentially positive, and could help alleviate expectations of and pressure on the industry's clothes horses. I also think the claims from the industry itself, arguing that the restrictions disenfranchise 'naturally thin' girls who always wanted to model a bit rich. Hey, I feel ripped off by the very tall modelling world because I'm five foot four. Furthermore, they would have been turned away for being 'too thin' ten years ago. Contextualise the situation, get a different job (that will last longer than five years), and get a clue.

My concerns are about how the moral panics treat their target. Often, it is as though they need protecting and guidance, with a voice of authority telling them what to do. Apparently, women still cannot think for themselves. Hello, women's liberation? Voice of reason, where did you go?

I have a sneaking suspicion that an industry established on viewing and aesthetics will always be attacked for violating physical and moral vision. Second wave feminists would have derided the fashion world for subscribing to a feminine ideal. People today question why some models are models at all, considering them ugly. It's all a matter of taste, and no one has any authority to tell another what should be considered attractive. Yes, designers are in a power position to send teeny items on tiny women down the runway, but that doesn't mean someone else has to agree it's what's hot. When Jean Paul Gaultier sent a size 20 model down the catwalk in lingerie, I did not agree it was a great stance against or for the debate. I do not think he was taking anything or anyone seriously. Big is beautiful? Overweight replacing underweight is not a sensible statement, nor is it respectful of the body at all. If Gaultier really wanted to make waves, maybe he could have had Australian size 12 women model his wears.

Jean Paul Gaultier size 20 model in lingerie
Jean Paul Gaultier's size 20 statement, image from dailymail.co.uk


I would love to see beautiful clothes on my ideal of a beautiful body, like Eva Green, Zooey Deschanel or some of my friends, but I know this will not happen. Frankly, I don't care: I'm looking at the clothes as a potential buyer, or for inspiration. The model just happens to wear what I'm considering, and is inconsequential to my decision. I am aware that this attitude is not universal, and I don't think it should be. The beauty of fashion is its invention, recycling, appropriation and invogorative capabilities, hardly the child of a single idea. I do not think moral panics surrounding the fashion industry will ever subside. I am a dubious person, and I am also starting to feel the first pricks of panic regarding the expiry date of models.

130
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   




Comments
8 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Chic Critique

September 27th 2007 08:41
Man you write well! Great post m-c!

See ya round soon!

Cheers
CC

Comment by D. Armenta

September 27th 2007 15:42
It's more a matter of practicality than aesthetics; rail-thin women with no curves or definition happen to be able to wear/model a much wider variety of clothing styles than any other body type. Designers have much less restriction when they don't have to take hips or boobs into consideration.

Any woman who feels insecure because she doesn't have a little-boy body should consider: just who is it that glorifies these types anyway? Ever had a look at Perez Hilton? Like to go out on a hot date with that?

Some clothing designers do use real women as models, i.e. www.pinupgirl.com and www.stopstaring.com .

As a former ballet student, I was relegated to the corps when I started to develop a woman's body. It made me insecure until one of my male classmates pointed out that the teacher who had constantly picked on my curves was hardly qualified to judge the appeal of a woman's body--since he was a gay male.


Comment by KylieW

September 28th 2007 03:02
You make a good point with the bandwagon thing. One minute it's size 0's that are evil and we should embrace our curves.....then it's 'dont' embrace them too much you fat pig'.

What happened to being healthy. Embrace healthy looking instead of railing against thinness by glorifying someone who is overweight.

It's all a bit weird. But then the media has always loved a bandwagon!!

Great post

Comment by Kleonaptra

September 28th 2007 04:45
I love this post so much - Youve said everything so PEFFECTLY!
I remember ten years ago. I think Cindy Crawford was a standard 12-14 at first?
And I too would love to see things on the bodies I deem beautiful....long and slender only if its meant to be like that, natural.....
And I love the way you describe the fashion world itself...I started sketching designing clothes, cos I had nothing to wear!

Comment by Wynona Lavota

September 28th 2007 04:55
^^ Indeed. I am somewhat annoyed at magazines that say someone is too thin and then next issue are crapping on about how fat somone looked when to me they looked perfectly normal. Bah!

I honestly must say I have not noticed an unjust panic but as you said, it may all just come down to opinion.

Comment by Sisi

October 2nd 2007 01:53
Fantastic post! I love Eva Green's body too...I think she's one of the most beautiful women ever...

Comment by Lidia

October 15th 2007 03:37
I too look at clothes from the perspective of wha's going to suit my body, not what looks good on models or in beauty mags.

I don't know who Eva Green is but I'm going to google her!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
580 Posts dating from March 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by techman
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]